Lorne Gunter is not cool with the CBC.
The CBC will never be able to exorcize its left-wing missionary zeal — for global warming, for Islam, for big government, Barack Obama, multiculturalism, public health care, human rights commissions and so on.
It’s not like the CBC exists in a vacuum. It is ultimately controlled by the federal government, which official supports all those things which a few vocal Conservatives hate so much (even Obama).
And it’s not like the federal government exists in a vacuum. Not even Stephen Harper was able to exorcise Ottawa’s “left-wing missionary zeal.” He might not be the loudest cheerleader for Medicare, but he wouldn’t dare challenge it.
Canada is, on the whole, a progressive nation. We elect progressive governments, present Parliament included. From that, we get a progressive public broadcaster.
The CBC is a symptom of our politics, not the cause.
Jeffrey Simpson’s argument that Queens Park is the most important government in the country these days makes me a little sad. Not because I don’t think the Ontario government is competent, but the federal government and the other provinces are, to put it kindly, not being helpful.
One of the weaknesses in Canadian confederation is out-sized power and undersized capacity of the smaller provinces to govern. The small provinces don’t have the capacity to provide services without federal (read: Ontario and Alberta) help, but the big provinces don’t get the support they need from the nation to create wealth in a global economy.
Is it time to restructure the television broadcasters in Canada? Improving on the current arrangement is no great feat.
CTV is hemorrhaging millions of dollars, Global is on death’s door, and even CBC is short on cash.
What I ask now, I ask as a cultural nationalist: would it really be so bad to open the border to the American networks? Prime time is already mostly American imports. Small market TV stations are already neglected or closing.
Let ABC, CBS, Fox, and NBC broadcast their own shows (which are already available on practically every Canadian TV) in the major markets with the same Canadian content rules as domestic networks. The average consumer probably wouldn’t notice. Then adequately fund the CBC to fill the gaps in places like London or Regina, which are not profitable but deserve a local station.
The National Post’s editorial board, fed up with Quebec’s continuing refusal to speak English and vote Conservative (or something), suggests the Quebecois should shut up or put up. Be like the rest of us or just separate already. They suggest it’s time for the federal government to “adopt a tough-love attitude” because the Tories have nothing to lose.
Maybe it’s the National Post’s editorialists that need to go. This federation is flexible and accommodating provincial differences is something it does well. If the editorialists want to live in a land of homogeneity and consensus, they can be the folks to go.
And if we’re going to be dividing Canadians by province, it should be pointed out that Quebec, Ontario, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia are Canada. The rest of you are late to the game, and have no right to ask any of the original players to go.
Canada’s been getting some good press lately, thanks mostly to the non-implosion of Canadian banks. Of course, this is really the minimum one should expect from a bank.
However, Tyler Cowen points out that its not very wise to invest most of the country’s GDP in trade with a nation of risky banks. No matter how safe our domestic banks, the economy will still tank if the Americans don’t have money to trade.
I’m of two minds when it comes to trading with the US. They present us with a large, convenient, and usually stable basket in which to place all our eggs. If we were one nation, nobody would expect Ontario to decouple with Michigan in favour of India. But we are not Americans and it is probably not a good idea to encourage the elephant-mouse qualities of our relationship.
Broadly speaking, trade with the US is good for Canada and should not be discouraged in any way. Yes, there are some potential rough spots with NAFTA (water and culture come to mind) but they are not treaty-killers. Ideally, we would grow our trade with the rest of the world even faster. Canada should be pursuing membership in DR-CAFTA and free trade with the EU, for example. Granted, I’m no economist, but there must be government tools or incentives that encourage international trade.
There’s probably nothing we can or could have done to shield ourselves entirely from this mess, but being coupled so tightly to one trading partner is risky business.
Chantal Hebert writes today about the rudderless Prime Minister, and Don Martin writes about the whispers of rats fleeing the PMO ship. Two is a trend, right?
Stephen Harper is in a much worse position than I would have imagined a few months ago. On the right, he has sold-out every principle of the old Reform Party and still failed to secure a majority government. On the left, he faces an emboldened opposition with a new, less bulliable leader. And on all fronts, the economy is dragging incumbent politicians down with it.
A majority government seems highly unlikely in the months (years?) that the economic turmoil continues, and in any case, what is the point if the PM becomes Brian Mulroney in the process?
US Republicans suddenly seem to be in the enviable position of opposing government spending without consequence. Saved from the economy by their own mistakes abroad, Republicans are returning to their small-government roots and letting the other guy weather the storm.
I have to wonder if Conservatives in Ottawa are jealous. If they had lost the last election (or even fallen during the coalition madness), they would be able to return to their political roots, criticize Stephane Dion’s recession, and bide their time until better days.